Showing 56 results

Catalogue Description
56 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
David Summerscale
GB 2014 WS-02-ORA-044 · Item · 2016-06-03
Part of Westminster School's Archive and Collections

Went to Sherbourne School. Parents lived in France. Read English at Cambridge. [2.50] Taught at University of Delhi. Unhappy at first but then loved it. [5.34] In 1939, Parents moved to Paris, then back to England in 1940. France as a long-standing interest for him. [6.54] Beginning to teach English at Charterhouse in 1962/63. Oliver van Oss, the Headmaster at Charterhouse. Very talented pupils from very different homes. Often very anxious pupils. [13.25] Less academic pressure then. More time to learn and enjoy. [16.10] Left Charterhouse to be Headmaster of Haileybury School, just after he got married. [19.05] Haileybury was still in the dark ages. Boarding only. 60-bed dormitories. Quite claustrophobic. [20.23] Not very stimulating academically. Spent 10 years there trying to modernise it. [23.43] Didn’t want to be a Headmaster. Loss of freedom, even then. The last generation of the amateur headmasters. Didn’t think too much about the next career step. [25.52] Had begun to start thinking that he couldn’t do much more as Headmaster there. [27.22] Distinct dislike between Charterhouse boys and Westminsters. [28.29] Contacted by Burke Trend, a Governor at Westminster, about the position of Head Master. The interview. A difficult interview question. [31.24] Call from Edward Carpenter to offer him the post. [32.10] Westminster wasn’t as academically successful as it thought it was. [33.04] Arrival at Westminster. John Rae. [35.29] Westminster needed Head Master who spent time in the Common Room, who was available to talk to. [36.18] Challenges of a school in London - like the IRA. The difference in tempo between Haileybury and Westminster. [38.21] His predecessor at Haileybury completely dominated the school. Westminster too had been dominated by Rae, his predecessor. Common Room and pupils were all doing as they liked. [40.12] He tried to encourage teachers to do what they enjoyed doing. [40.49] New staff needed to be robust. Interviews and practice classes were less rigorous then. No hierarchy or Senior Management Team. Would rely on the Head of Department. Appointments often relied on hunches. [44.13] House Masters were more difficult to appoint. [47.19] Left Westminster just before it became more professional. The first Ofsted inspection. Creating policies for Ofsted. [50.44] Jim Cogan, the Master of the Queen’s Scholars. The role of Under Master. [54.43] Living in 17, Dean’s Yard with his family. Uncomfortable but loved their home. Some privacy. [57.30] Very good atmosphere in the Common Room. [58.01] No facilities for music or science when he began. The Robert Hooke Centre Appeal. [1.1.38] A community spirit among the teachers, since all in close quarters. Accommodation for staff a growing problem. [1.02.53] The challenges of establishing new houses with very little space. Problem of growing pupil numbers. Existing houses were overcrowded. The creation of Hackluyt’s and Milne’s, and the Masters involved. [1.06.50] His participation in sport. A way of meeting other teachers and pupils on common ground. Refreshing that sport wasn’t extremely competitive. [1.10.01] Dramatic productions. [1.11.10] Relations between the Abbey and the school. 1.15.10] Wesley Carr, Dean of Westminster. Undervalued by some within the Abbey. Respected by some in the School. [1.17.53] Receiver Generals and their relations with the school. [1.18.30] His experience as a parent of a Westminster pupil. Relationship with Tristram Jones-Parry, the Head Master who succeeded him. The effect of Westminster on his daughter and son. [1.22.55] Age differences didn’t seem to matter as much at Westminster as at some other schools. Less of a hierarchy among pupils. [1.24.12] Changes to headmasters’ roles. Felt the right time to leave.

Daisy Goodwin
GB 2014 WS-02-ORA-062 · Item · 2022-12-01
Part of Westminster School's Archive and Collections

Born in London, parents divorced when she was five. Lived with her grandparents and then her father. First Secondary school was Queen’s College. Father urged her to apply to Westminster. She did not love the all-girl environment of Queen’s College [2:15]. Did not know much about Westminster before arriving. Quite naïve, only fifteen, not as mature. Good for ego as there were fewer girls, girls got a lot of attention and were more mature than the boys [4:37]. Felt that there were lots of rules at Westminster compared to her secondary school, which was quite relaxed. Was in Ashburnham house with her brother. School on Saturday mornings [7:37]. Took Greek, found that literature was fine, but the boys were better than her. There were eccentric teachers. At Queen’s College, was the most academic and found Westminster promoted a nature of competition, particularly among other girls [10:00]. A-levels in Greek, Russian (one year), History in the first year. Did English in one year. Russian teaching was ok, English and History teaching very good. Taught English by Rory Stewart and Richard Jacobs [14:20]. Went on the study History at university. Westminster was a great preparation for university. Sent daughters here [16:30]. PHAB. Very interesting, not completely frictionless environment. Felt that they got more out of it [19:54]. Traditions; Abbey every morning, Latin prayers, the Greaze. Not a sporty environment. Went to primary schools in Wandsworth and took the children out for the afternoon. Found that people often did what their friends wanted to do. Put on two plays and acted in them [24:11]. Took part in production and directed a play in the first year. Did a talent contest and was in the Latin Play and the choir. Joined in on a lot, felt she wanted attention. The environment of Westminster encouraged doing a lot of activities all the time. Never felt threatened by boys maybe because there were fewer girls or because they were exposed to less. Girls now feel more threatened by male presence. Could have had these experiences but did not notice them at the time. Female solidarity, the Head Master’s wife used to invite the girls for tea. Only one female teacher. Girls did not wear uniform, but boys did. Difficult to police what the girl’s wore [33.43]. Food always revolting. Not a lot of bullying. Some boys were gay and were out about this, the school was accepting. Still transitioning from being a school all about boys, to a school where girls were being integrated, took a long time. Her sister attended in the 80s [37:49]. Everyone’s Invited has potentially changed the perception of the school. Social media has massively influenced the differences of her experiences compared to her daughters. Always being in the male gaze did not feel unpleasant but her daughters found this to be different. Young men now more threatened by girls as they feel the girls have an unfair advantage and these young, privileged men will not have the same opportunities as they used to. Liked how it was anti-authority when she attended, now has probably changed due to expenses, not everyone’s parents used to be super rich [43:18]. Drugs at Westminster; a few boys got expelled for this, not considered particularly cool, did not get much excitement from it. A lot of the teachers were older so a lot of them did not have the same upbringings surrounding drugs. Probably more liberal than it is now [46:57]. John Rae taught her history, was always at the Latin Prayers, and was very much a presence in the school. He was quite progressive (introduced girls for example) [48:47]. She was in a documentary. No duty of care. A lot of people had seen it. Asked invasive questions [53:12]. Had a lot of fun at Westminster, learnt a lot, pleased with herself, social and romantic memories. Must have been times where she was unhappy, falling in love, constantly being observed, working hard. Felt that she thrived in this environment. Father felt the documentary was shedding light on her being in an area that had not been gentrified [56:30]. Felt that for girls it helped if you were pretty and confident and not intimidated by the boys and the Masters. Could not imagine boarding there and being constantly at school. A lot of male admiration that felt great at the time [58:10]. After Westminster, felt that the school was brilliant in placing her in a job afterward. You instantly have connections which is very elitist but does help majorly. Feels slightly differently now due to the class divide in education. Felt very lucky to come to Westminster and was glad not to stay at Queen’s College. Felt she made the most of the experience despite it breeding a particular arrogance. When going off to work at the BBC, she realised that life is not actually like this, and people do not realise how lucky you are. Felt that Westminster was a bubble, when going into the workforce realised the existence of sexism, and that privilege was sometimes not an asset. Felt politically detached [01:02:39]. Believed John Rae did his best, and the elitism is not the school’s fault. Wanted her children to have the same experience she had. Need to be a certain type of child to attend Westminster. Feels like Westminster is a very tolerant place [01:06:02]. In the future, feels that schools like Westminster will have to work harder to broaden the social mix of the school. Thinks that it would be a shame to abolish these schools. Shocking that bright kids cannot get into Westminster due to money and blocks their opportunities [01:08:04]. Not very socio-economically diverse. Feels like the school should be co-educational all the way through. Attitudes towards girls may change if the school is co-ed the whole way [01:10:53]. Westminster considered the “lefty, bohemian, less sporty.” A lot of rivalry between people.

Andrew Johnson
GB 2014 WS-02-ORA-004 · Item · 2012-05-10
Part of Westminster School's Archive and Collections

His life as a pupil at Westminster. Cliques and the effect of the arrival of girls in sixth form. [4.09] Stayed in touch with surprisingly few Westminster schoolmates. [6.21] Phab [experience week in partnership with a charity working with disabled and non-disabled children]. How it has changed over the years. His work gave it more stability, health and safety clearance and financial stability. [10.54] Phab’s expansion over the years, and possible reasons for its growth. [13.54] Difference between his school days and time as a teacher. School now seems better able to help pupils who are less academically gifted than the others. School takes part in more outreach and charity work. School facilities much better. The Manoukian Music Centre, Millicent Fawcett Hall [theatre], Weston’s [classrooms] and Lawrence Hall [sports centre] were all acquired after his schooldays. [16.20] Difficult to tell if there’s been a change in ethos. Still promotes individuality. [18.07] Effects of internet. [19.25] Effects of increased numbers of pupils. [21.28] How his experience of the school has changed now he’s a teacher. [23.06] Will miss colleagues and pupils, but not the physical place. [26.12] His future plans. His move to the London Academy of Excellence. Potential to make a difference to social mobility. How he will interpret the role. [31.11] Proud moments as a pupil. [33.22] Proud moments as a teacher. The changed atmosphere in Ashburnham. The house publication The Ash Tree and house concerts and plays. The house has become a community. Has enjoyed his time as a teacher.